I was supposed to send you this tomorrow


I just finished recording next Tuesday's podcast:

Want to Look Better & Not Just Weigh Less? Follow This 4-Step Process

It's for people who:

  1. Primarily care about seeing the scale go down, or weighing a specific number
  2. Don't actually care about the number on the scale—and just want to look better

Funny enough, both groups need to follow the SAME four-step process to achieve what they're ultimately after: a leaner, more toned look.

The episode was inspired by my client Sarah, who left the first group (scale-focused) for the second (body composition-focused):

"Before this latest stretch, I never cared as long as the scale went down. I feel like I’m finally doing this the right way and it’s not a quick fix to get the scale to an arbitrary number."

The result?

She's lost almost 19 pounds of fat, specifically, and has the visual results to show for it.

Not just a lower number on the scale.


You'll obviously learn the whole four-step process next Tuesday, but as a preview:

Step #1 is capping your weight loss at 0.01% of your bodyweight per week.

Otherwise you'll lose a bunch of muscle and look worse.

Quite honestly, half that—0.005% of your bodyweight per week—is a MUCH better pace for most people, since your deficit won't need to be huge.

0.01% is just the most commonly cited cap, and a pace we're seeing people exceed all the time now because of GLP-1's—so I figured I'd start there.

Here's what .005% looks like at a few different bodyweights:

  • 230 pounds: 1.15 pounds per week
  • 200 pounds: 1 pound per week
  • 170 pounds: .85 pounds per week
  • 140 pounds: .7 pounds per week

Naturally, these are NOT hard rules.

Just references for what could be a good pace.

Much more to come next Tuesday.

Sam

P.S. Want me to send you the link when it's live?

Reply to this email with the word "PODCAST."

I'll fire it over as soon as it's up.

Sam Forget

I send powerful lessons, stories, and no-BS transformation tips to my private email list 1-2 times per week. Subscribe here to begin your OWN transformation:

Read more from Sam Forget

I spent this past weekend in Puerto Madryn, a coastal city in Patagonia known for its marine life. It's very normal to see penguins, sea lions, elephant seals, and even whales right off the coast. As an animal lover, you can imagine how much I enjoyed this. I walked this pier in the mornings and evenings... and routinely saw penguins and sea lions swimming around I also enjoyed an enormous amount of food. Buenos Aires, despite being right on the water, isn't exactly known for its seafood. For...

"1,200 calories is for a toddler!" This is what I would've told you at 17 years old, as a brand new trainer. Partially because I believed it was true—partially because I saw other trainers getting crucified for telling their clients to eat 1,200 calories. So for a long time, I had 1,400 as an arbitrary floor that I wouldn't drop clients under. But here's the problem with this: Many people—especially women—maintain on 1,600-1,800 calories per day. So to lose weight at a reasonable, motivating...

On Tuesday, I dropped a podcast on how to look better—not just weigh less. Most people want to look better, obviously, but approach dieting as if their only goal IS weighing less. There are important differences between these pursuits, as my client Sarah knows. That's why she ditched her scale focus for a body composition focus, and lost almost 20 pounds of pure body fat using a specific four-step process. I broke down all four steps here: Spotify Apple Any other platform But I wish I...